<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nisadas &#187; reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nisadas.com/journal/tag/reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nisadas.com/journal</link>
	<description>unstructured. thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:37:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The magic of books</title>
		<link>http://www.nisadas.com/journal/2005/09/the-magic-of-words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nisadas.com/journal/2005/09/the-magic-of-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dulan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nisadas.com/journal/2005/09/the-magic-of-words/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dropped by at the International Book Fair at the BMICH on Tuesday. So had another couple of thousand people. Which got me to thinking - in this day and age - are books still in fashion?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dropped by at the International Book Fair at the BMICH on Tuesday. So had another couple of thousand people. Which got me to thinking &#8211; in this day and age &#8211; are books still in fashion?</p>
<p>Why read a book? Rather &#8211; why go out and actually pay money for one? After all, we can find loads of books off <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/">Project Gutenberg</a> and various other sources. Adobe Acrobat versions of many books are easily available for download off the net.</p>
<p>Most of us have got a TV and/or computer. This gives us many options &#8211; cable, VCD, DVD and the internet to name a few &#8211; as sources of entertainment. This could be why many people today are said to not read as often. But the strange thing is &#8211; many people still do. I&#8217;d venture that the stuff they read is off good ol&#8217; paper.</p>
<p>Case in point &#8211; the few films that I&#8217;ve watched that are based on books I&#8217;ve read (or vice versa). Jurassic Park &#8211; the film &#8211; was groundbreaking stuff in terms of special effects etc etc, but IMHO not anywhere close to being as good as the story in the book. So many people I know would agree &#8211; with respect to the differences between the book and the film.</p>
<p>Then there are the books based on the film. Reading Terry Brooks&#8217; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345427653/103-8830990-7039819?v=glance">novelisation</a> of Star Wars Episode I:The Phantom Menace was a great relief (being something of a fan of the original episodes), not having enjoyed the film at all.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s because of the way in which the written word can take us from place to place &#8211; from the sweeping tableau of the general scenery to right behind the eyes of the characters &#8211; their thoughts, their feelings, their inner demons.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d doubt there&#8217;s anything more personal about such an experience. The glimpses into the thoughts of other people &#8211; fictitious or otherwise &#8211; certainly broadens one&#8217;s perspective. Perhaps the greatest film directors (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000338/">Coppola</a>?) can push the most talented actors to achieve something close to this effect &#8211; but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s ever as effective as the written word.</p>
<p>Given the advances in transferring books online &#8211; why would anyone want to regress and read off paper pages when they can read online? You have search functions, annotation features (in most programs) and other fancy things that &#8220;hardcopy&#8221; books don&#8217;t have. Why would <a href="http://ivap.blogspot.com/2005/07/meme-of-books.html">Ivap</a> want to <em>print</em> the ebooks he downloaded, to read?</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s because you can&#8217;t curl up somewhere with a warm mug of [preferred beverage] with your laptop. Or rather, even if you could, you&#8217;d rather not. While I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading Wodehouse on the PC (via Gutenberg), there&#8217;s nothing to compare with reading from a book. The actual feel of the pages, the freedom to sit comfortably without the radiation of a computer screen &#8211; I <em>like</em> that.</p>
<p>It seems that until <a href="http://www.sciencentral.com/articles/view.php3?article_id=218392010&#038;language=english">Electronic Paper</a> becomes good enough, good old books will still be in fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nisadas.com/journal/2005/09/the-magic-of-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
